Subject: Heating Repair Needed at [Your Address] – Request for Repair Date

Dear [Landlord's Name],

I'm writing about the heating at [your address, unit number], which has not been working since [date the problem started]. I first reported it on [date of first report] and followed up on [date(s) of later contact], but it has now been about three weeks without a repair.

I appreciate that things can get busy. However, with the current temperatures, the flat is getting very cold, and it is becoming difficult to live in comfortably. [Optional: add a specific detail, e.g., "The indoor temperature has been dropping to around X°C/°F overnight," or "This is especially difficult because I work from home / have a young child."]

Could you please confirm by [specific date, e.g., Friday, March 8] when a repair technician will come? I'm happy to be flexible with access. I'm generally available [list days/times], and I can arrange access at other times if needed.

If there is anything you need from me to help move this forward, such as photos, a description of the problem, or a contact number for the technician, please let me know and I'll send it straight away.

Thank you for your help. I'd like to get this resolved quickly and smoothly for both of us.

Kind regards, [Your Name] [Your Phone Number] [Your Address / Unit Number]

A few tips to help you get results without creating conflict:

• Send it in writing (email or letter) so you have a dated record, even if you've only called before.

• Keep copies of all messages and note the dates of any calls.

• If you get no reply by your deadline, send a short, calm follow-up. You could add a line such as: "I understand landlords are generally required to keep heating in working order, so I'd be grateful if we could arrange this as soon as possible." This reminds them of their obligation without sounding like a threat.

• If it still isn't fixed, check your local tenant rights. Most areas have a housing authority or tenant advice service that can help.

Subject: Heating repair—request for confirmed completion date

Dear [Landlord’s Name],

I’m following up on the heating issue I first reported on [date]. It has now been three weeks, and the heating is still not working. This is affecting my ability to live comfortably in the property and needs to be resolved promptly.

Please confirm by [date] when a qualified technician will attend and when the repair is expected to be completed. If there is a delay with parts or scheduling, please let me know what temporary heating arrangements you can provide in the meantime.

I’d like to resolve this cooperatively. My priority is simply to have reliable heating restored, and I’m happy to coordinate access to help get the work done.

Thank you for your prompt attention. I look forward to receiving a confirmed plan.

Kind regards, [Your Name] [Property Address]

useDebouncedValue and useDebouncedCallback

Below are two hooks:

1. useDebouncedValue: debounces a value. This is what you asked for.

2. useDebouncedCallback: debounces a function, with cancel and flush controls. It's useful when you need to debounce an event handler rather than state.

Both cancel any pending timer when the component unmounts, so no state update or callback runs after unmount.

1. useDebouncedValue

// useDebouncedValue.ts
import { useEffect, useState } from 'react';

/**
 * Returns `value` after it has stopped changing for `delay` ms.
 * Any pending update is cancelled when `value` or `delay` changes,
 * or when the component unmounts.
 */
export function useDebouncedValue<T>(value: T, delay: number = 300): T {
  const [debouncedValue, setDebouncedValue] = useState<T>(value);

  useEffect(() => {
    const timeoutId: ReturnType<typeof setTimeout> = setTimeout(() => {
      setDebouncedValue(value);
    }, delay);

    // Runs before the next effect (value/delay changed) AND on unmount.
    return () => {
      clearTimeout(timeoutId);
    };
  }, [value, delay]);

  return debouncedValue;
}

Usage

import { useEffect, useState } from 'react';
import { useDebouncedValue } from './useDebouncedValue';

interface User {
  id: string;
  name: string;
}

export function UserSearch() {
  const [query, setQuery] = useState<string>('');
  const [results, setResults] = useState<User[]>([]);
  const debouncedQuery = useDebouncedValue(query, 400);

  useEffect(() => {
    if (!debouncedQuery) {
      setResults([]);
      return;
    }

    const controller = new AbortController();

    fetch(`/api/users?q=${encodeURIComponent(debouncedQuery)}`, {
      signal: controller.signal,
    })
      .then((res) => res.json() as Promise<User[]>)
      .then(setResults)
      .catch((err: unknown) => {
        if ((err as Error).name !== 'AbortError') console.error(err);
      });

    return () => controller.abort(); // cancel in-flight request too
  }, [debouncedQuery]);

  return (
    <>
      <input value={query} onChange={(e) => setQuery(e.target.value)} />
      <ul>
        {results.map((u) => (
          <li key={u.id}>{u.name}</li>
        ))}
      </ul>
    </>
  );
}

2. useDebouncedCallback (with cancel / flush)

// useDebouncedCallback.ts
import { useEffect, useLayoutEffect, useMemo, useRef } from 'react';

export interface DebouncedFunction<Args extends unknown[]> {
  (...args: Args): void;
  /** Cancel any pending invocation. */
  cancel: () => void;
  /** Immediately invoke the pending call, if any. */
  flush: () => void;
  /** Whether a call is currently scheduled. */
  isPending: () => boolean;
}

// useLayoutEffect warns during SSR; fall back to useEffect on the server.
const useIsomorphicLayoutEffect =
  typeof window !== 'undefined' ? useLayoutEffect : useEffect;

export function useDebouncedCallback<Args extends unknown[]>(
  callback: (...args: Args) => void,
  delay: number = 300
): DebouncedFunction<Args> {
  const callbackRef = useRef(callback);
  const timeoutRef = useRef<ReturnType<typeof setTimeout> | null>(null);
  const pendingArgsRef = useRef<Args | null>(null);

  // Always call the latest callback without resetting the debounce timer.
  useIsomorphicLayoutEffect(() => {
    callbackRef.current = callback;
  }, [callback]);

  const debounced = useMemo<DebouncedFunction<Args>>(() => {
    const invoke = (): void => {
      const args = pendingArgsRef.current;
      timeoutRef.current = null;
      pendingArgsRef.current = null;
      if (args) callbackRef.current(...args);
    };

    const cancel = (): void => {
      if (timeoutRef.current !== null) {
        clearTimeout(timeoutRef.current);
        timeoutRef.current = null;
      }
      pendingArgsRef.current = null;
    };

    const fn = ((...args: Args): void => {
      pendingArgsRef.current = args;
      if (timeoutRef.current !== null) clearTimeout(timeoutRef.current);
      timeoutRef.current = setTimeout(invoke, delay);
    }) as DebouncedFunction<Args>;

    fn.cancel = cancel;
    fn.flush = () => {
      if (timeoutRef.current !== null) {
        clearTimeout(timeoutRef.current);
        invoke();
      }
    };
    fn.isPending = () => timeoutRef.current !== null;

    return fn;
  }, [delay]);

  // Cancel on unmount (and when `delay` changes, which creates a new function).
  useEffect(() => {
    return () => debounced.cancel();
  }, [debounced]);

  return debounced;
}

Usage

import { useDebouncedCallback } from './useDebouncedCallback';

export function AutoSaveEditor({ docId }: { docId: string }) {
  const save = useDebouncedCallback((content: string) => {
    void fetch(`/api/docs/${docId}`, {
      method: 'PUT',
      body: JSON.stringify({ content }),
    });
  }, 1000);

  return (
    <textarea
      onChange={(e) => save(e.target.value)} // typed: (content: string) => void
      onBlur={() => save.flush()}            // save immediately when leaving
    />
  );
}

Notes

• ReturnType<typeof setTimeout> keeps the timer type correct in both browser (number) and Node (Timeout) environments.

• Cancellation on unmount comes from the effect cleanup functions. React calls them on unmount, so clearTimeout stops any pending setState or callback.

• Stable callback identity: useDebouncedCallback stores the latest callback in a ref. Passing an inline arrow function therefore doesn't reset the timer on every render. The returned function only changes when delay changes.

• StrictMode double-mounts effects in development. Both hooks handle this correctly because cleanup clears the timer before the effect runs again.

import { useEffect, useState } from "react";

/**
 * Returns the value after it has stopped changing for `delayMs`.
 * Cancels pending updates when the value/delay changes or on unmount.
 */
export function useDebouncedValue<T>(value: T, delayMs: number): T {
  const [debouncedValue, setDebouncedValue] = useState<T>(() => value);

  useEffect(() => {
    const timeoutId = setTimeout(() => {
      // The wrapper also supports function-valued T.
      setDebouncedValue(() => value);
    }, delayMs);

    return () => {
      clearTimeout(timeoutId);
    };
  }, [value, delayMs]);

  return debouncedValue;
}

Usage:

import { useState } from "react";
import { useDebouncedValue } from "./useDebouncedValue";

export function SearchInput() {
  const [query, setQuery] = useState("");
  const debouncedQuery = useDebouncedValue(query, 300);

  return (
    <div>
      <input
        value={query}
        onChange={(event) => setQuery(event.target.value)}
        placeholder="Search…"
      />
      <p>Debounced query: {debouncedQuery}</p>
    </div>
  );
}

The initial value is returned immediately. Subsequent changes are delayed until delayMs has elapsed without another change; effect cleanup cancels the pending timer on unmount.

About 33%, or roughly 1 in 3

This assumes "99% accurate" means the test correctly flags 99% of users (sensitivity) and correctly clears 99% of non-users (specificity).

The calculation (Bayes' theorem)

$$ P(\text{user} \mid +) = \frac{P(+ \mid \text{user})\,P(\text{user})}{P(+ \mid \text{user})\,P(\text{user}) + P(+ \mid \text{non-user})\,P(\text{non-user})} $$

$$ = \frac{0.99 \times 0.005}{0.99 \times 0.005 + 0.01 \times 0.995} = \frac{0.00495}{0.0149} \approx 0.332 $$

The intuitive version: imagine 10,000 people

Of about 150 positive results, only about 50 are real users. The other ~100 are false positives. So a positive result means roughly a 1 in 3 chance of actual drug use.

Why it surprises people

1. Base rate neglect. People focus on the vivid "99% accurate" figure and ignore how rare drug use is. When a condition is rare, even a small error rate applied to the huge non-user population produces more false positives than there are true positives.

2. Confusing the two conditional probabilities. The test tells you P(positive | user) = 99%. People instinctively treat that as P(user | positive). These are very different numbers. "Most users test positive" does not mean "most positives are users."

3. The 1% error feels negligible. But 1% of 9,950 non-users (~100 people) is double the entire user population (50 people).

Practical takeaway

This is why positive screening results are confirmed with a second, independent test. If someone tests positive twice, the probability jumps to about 98%, because the first positive raises the "base rate" from 0.5% to 33% before the second test is applied. The same logic applies to medical screening for rare diseases, fraud detection, and security screening.

About 33.2%—assuming “99% accurate” means both 99% sensitivity and 99% specificity. That is, the test detects 99% of users and correctly gives a negative result to 99% of non-users.

Imagine testing 20,000 people:

Of the 298 positive results, only 99 are from actual users:

[ P(\text{uses drug}\mid\text{positive})=\frac{99}{99+199}\approx \boxed{33.2\%}. ]

Why it surprises people: We tend to confuse “the test is positive in 99% of users” with “99% of people who test positive are users.” Those are different probabilities. Because non-users vastly outnumber users, even a 1% false-positive rate produces more false positives than true positives. Ignoring this imbalance is called base-rate neglect.

If “99% accurate” refers only to overall accuracy, rather than sensitivity and specificity separately, there isn’t enough information to calculate the answer.